At some point the truth comes out. The WHO and CDC, at one point or another, said masks should not be worn by healthy people then flip-flopped. It became a placebo effect where everyone wanted to “pitch in” and “protect others.” Right?
Well, what has happened now? A fabric of any kind worn around a person’s breathing exits (mouth and nose), creates the perfect environment to breed bacteria and viruses starting after about 20-30 minutes of wearing them after which they should be discarded. This Samaritan-act of wearing masks has created millions and millions of bacteria-laden carriers to walk the aisles of our stores and serve us in restaurants, touching their faces/masks about 15-20 times an hour and then touching other items. Without the masks, the bacteria and viruses cannot live. You see, our body was designed darned well to take care of us. When you start fooling with God’s design, rarely do you come up with a better solution. Take ’em off. Let people decide for themselves and judge no one.
“They” couldn’t just step in and say, “Isolate yourselves. Stay off the streets. Close the schools. Close the businesses. Everybody will be taken care of from now on. You’ll all be on the government dole whether or not you work. You’ll all have food stamps and other rationing stamps. We’re taking care of you now. We know what’s best.”
Why couldn’t “they” do this before? Because smart people would have rebelled. Smart people, liberty-loving people, lovers of the Second Amendment and other God-given rights, supporters of the US Constitution would have stood up to “them.”
But “they” could accomplish just what “they” wanted by creating a “health issue.” Who would argue that we should stay home, stay in lock down, only go out when necessary, and wear that mask (even if it causes more problems than not), and practice Social Distancing. It meant that greetings were done away with, smiles became extinct, politenesses were unnecessary. Why? Because if you smiled, no one could see it. If you greeted someone or excused yourself, no one could hear or understand you. Staying away from someone meant no hugs, no kisses, no handshakes, no high fives. It meant that emotional contacts were discontinued. A society becomes cold and unfeeling. Guess what? That is what “they” want.
“They” want to have a cold, closed society where people talk less and less to each other; where people are urged to ‘tattle’ on their neighbor for going against the rules; and sooner than later, children will be encouraged to tell on their parents for disobeying orders.
“They” want you right where you are headed. “They” will have total control. Your every move will be monitored. The pleasures of life will dwindle.
We have been fooled, and it was our choice to be fooled. We willingly went along because of fear; we gave up our right to assemble; our children were sent home, and our churches closed. Big companies were allowed to remain open (although their shelves are still not full), while Ma and Pa shops were closed and closed long enough to devastate lives and change things forever.
This is not over, Folks. Watch the Elite One-World Government step in and take over. “They’ve” been working on this and waiting for just the right time to make their move for many years. The Constitution always stood in “their” way, but a non-threatening virus could scare the shit out of people, and those people would bend and fall easily. Those people would succumb to all orders, because COVID 19 was just too frightening!
Many of you think this started with Obama’s reign of terror, but actually, it started many, many years ago. Obama just pushed things along. President Wilson helped a great deal when he signed into law the Federal Reserve Act on December 22, 1913. Later, he regretted what he had done. He is reported to have said before he died, “I have unwittingly ruined my country.” No truer words ever spoken. Now, “they” had just what they wanted–Control of the money, and control of the money meant control of the people.
We are not being governed; we are being ruled. Love your freedom? Don’t sit there and do nothing then. Organize. You are in for the fight of your life!
**CHD Note: This is a letter from Renata Dziak, a Canadian forensic scientist trained in immunology and microbiology (and the mother of two children), explaining
“We are afraid that 1 million infections with the new virus will lead to 30 deaths per day over the next 100 days. But we do not realise that 20, 30, 40 or 100 patients positive for normal coronaviruses are already dying every day.
[The government’s anti-COVID19 measures] are grotesque, absurd and very dangerous […] The life expectancy of millions is being shortened. The horrifying impact on the world economy threatens the existence of countless people. The consequences on medical care are profound. Already services to patients in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling. All this will impact profoundly on our whole society.
All these measures are leading to self-destruction and collective suicide based on nothing but a spook.”
Politicians are being courted by scientists…scientists who want to be important to get money for their institutions. Scientists who just swim along in the mainstream and want their part of it […] And what is missing right now is a rational way of looking at things.
“We should be asking questions like “How did you find out this virus was dangerous?”, “How was it before?”, “Didn’t we have the same thing last year?”, “Is it even something new?”
“I have never seen anything like this, anything anywhere near like this. I’m not talking about the pandemic, because I’ve seen 30 of them, one every year. It is called influenza. And other respiratory illness viruses, we don’t always know what they are. But I’ve never seen this reaction, and I’m trying to understand why.
I worry about the message to the public, about the fear of coming into contact with people, being in the same space as people, shaking their hands, having meetings with people. I worry about many, many consequences related to that.
In Hubei, in the province of Hubei, where there has been the most cases and deaths by far, the actual number of cases reported is 1 per 1000 people and the actual rate of deaths reported is 1 per 20,000. So maybe that would help to put things into perspective.”
“Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes. As most health systems have limited testing capacity, selection bias may even worsen in the near future.
The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher.
Could the Covid-19 case fatality rate be that low? No, some say, pointing to the high rate in elderly people. However, even some so-called mild or common-cold-type coronaviruses that have been known for decades can have case fatality rates as high as 8% when they infect elderly people in nursing homes.
If we had not known about a new virus out there, and had not checked individuals with PCR tests, the number of total deaths due to “influenza-like illness” would not seem unusual this year. At most, we might have casually noted that flu this season seems to be a bit worse than average.”
“Italy is known for its enormous morbidity in respiratory problems, more than three times any other European country. In the US about 40,000 people die in a regular flu season and so far 40-50 people have died of the coronavirus, most of them in a nursing home in Kirkland, Washington.
In every country, more people die from regular flu compared with those who die from the coronavirus.
…there is a very good example that we all forget: the swine flu in 2009. That was a virus that reached the world from Mexico and until today there is no vaccination against it. But what? At that time there was no Facebook or there maybe was but it was still in its infancy. The corona virus, in contrast, is a virus with public relations.
Whoever thinks that governments end viruses is wrong.”
“We have reliable figures from Italy and a work by epidemiologists, which has been published in the renowned science journal ‹Science›, which examined the spread in China. This makes it clear that around 85 percent of all infections have occurred without anyone noticing the infection. 90 percent of the deceased patients are verifiably over 70 years old, 50 percent over 80 years.
In Italy, one in ten people diagnosed die, according to the findings of the Science publication, that is statistically one of every 1,000 people infected. Each individual case is tragic, but often – similar to the flu season – it affects people who are at the end of their lives.
If we close the schools, we will prevent the children from quickly becoming immune.
We should better integrate the scientific facts into the political decisions.”
“I’m not a fan of lockdown. Anyone who imposes something like this must also say when and how to pick it up again. Since we have to assume that the virus will be with us for a long time, I wonder when we will return to normal? You can’t keep schools and daycare centers closed until the end of the year. Because it will take at least that long until we have a vaccine. Italy has imposed a lockdown and has the opposite effect. They quickly reached their capacity limits, but did not slow down the virus spread within the lockdown.”
“The new pathogen is not that dangerous, it is even less dangerous than Sars-1. The special thing is that Sars-CoV-2 replicates in the upper throat area and is therefore much more infectious because the virus jumps from throat to throat, so to speak. But that is also an advantage: Because Sars-1 replicates in the deep lungs, it is not so infectious, but it definitely gets on the lungs, which makes it more dangerous.
You also have to take into account that the Sars-CoV-2 deaths in Germany were exclusively old people. In Heinsberg, for example, a 78-year-old man with previous illnesses died of heart failure, and that without Sars-2 lung involvement. Since he was infected, he naturally appears in the Covid 19 statistics. But the question is whether he would not have died anyway, even without Sars-2.”
“The problem of SARS-CoV-2 is probably overestimated, as 2.6 million people die of respiratory infections each year compared with less than 4000 deaths for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of writing.
This study compared the mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 in OECD countries (1.3%) with the mortality rate of common coronaviruses identified in AP-HM patients (0.8%) from 1 January 2013 to 2 March 2020. Chi-squared test was performed, and the P-value was 0.11 (not significant).
…it should be noted that systematic studies of other coronaviruses (but not yet for SARS-CoV-2) have found that the percentage of asymptomatic carriers is equal to or even higher than the percentage of symptomatic patients. The same data for SARS-CoV-2 may soon be available, which will further reduce the relative risk associated with this specific pathology.”
“I am deeply concerned that the social, economic and public health consequences of this near-total meltdown of normal life — schools and businesses closed, gatherings banned — will be long-lasting and calamitous, possibly graver than the direct toll of the virus itself. The stock market will bounce back in time, but many businesses never will. The unemployment, impoverishment and despair likely to result will be public health scourges of the first order.”
“Consider the effect of shutting down offices, schools, transportation systems, restaurants, hotels, stores, theaters, concert halls, sporting events and other venues indefinitely and leaving all of their workers unemployed and on the public dole. The likely result would be not just a depression but a complete economic breakdown, with countless permanently lost jobs, long before a vaccine is ready or natural immunity takes hold.
[T]he best alternative will probably entail letting those at low risk for serious disease continue to work, keep business and manufacturing operating, and “run” society, while at the same time advising higher-risk individuals to protect themselves through physical distancing and ramping up our health-care capacity as aggressively as possible. With this battle plan, we could gradually build up immunity without destroying the financial structure on which our lives are based.”
“Our main problem is that no one will ever get in trouble for measures that are too draconian. They will only get in trouble if they do too little. So, our politicians and those working with public health do much more than they should do.
No such draconian measures were applied during the 2009 influenza pandemic, and they obviously cannot be applied every winter, which is all year round, as it is always winter somewhere. We cannot close down the whole world permanently.
Should it turn out that the epidemic wanes before long, there will be a queue of people wanting to take credit for this. And we can be damned sure draconian measures will be applied again next time. But remember the joke about tigers. “Why do you blow the horn?” “To keep the tigers away.” “But there are no tigers here.” “There you see!”
My sister and I started this site, because we saw that important videos were being deleted from YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other sites. We wanted to fight back and decided a website where things could not be deleted was the best way. It was not without cost, however, and our combined savings is not enough to make this site grow and be a thorn in tyranny’s ass. Help us make this website a place where patriots of the world join together in the fight of our lives. Any donation will help our cause. Thank you.